Ryzen 7 5825U 2022 8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt 11.89 +22.8% Ryzen 5 5625U 2022 6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt 9.68 i3-12100F i5-13600K i9-14900KS Ryzen 5 5500 Ryzen 5 7500F Ryzen 7 7800X3D Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by a significant 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results. Ryzen 7 5825U Ryzen 5 5625U Comparing Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U.Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Ryzen 7 5825U11.89 +22.8% Ryzen 5 5625U9.68 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption andphysics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Benchmark coverage: 68% Ryzen 7 5825U18384 +22.8% Ryzen 5 5625U14973 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 23% in Passmark. GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Benchmark coverage: 42% Ryzen 7 5825U1668 +5.6% Ryzen 5 5625U1580 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core. GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Benchmark coverage: 42% Ryzen 7 5825U6253 +14.4% Ryzen 5 5625U5468 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core. Cinebench R10is an ancient ray tracingbenchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle. Benchmark coverage: 20% Ryzen 7 5825U6304 +8.6% Ryzen 5 5625U5806 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core. Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10usingall the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16in this version. Benchmark coverage: 19% Ryzen 7 5825U32641 +9.8% Ryzen 5 5625U29724 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core. 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated toartificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19% Ryzen 7 5825U11292 Ryzen 5 5625U11440 +1.3% Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 5825U by 1% in 3DMark06 CPU. wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less isbenchmark result, the faster the processor. Benchmark coverage: 18% Ryzen 7 5825U9.2 Ryzen 5 5625U6.46 +42.4% Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 42% in wPrime 32. Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads issupported in this version. Benchmark coverage: 17% Ryzen 7 5825U19 +16.8% Ryzen 5 5625U16 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 17% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core. Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 15% Ryzen 7 5825U1778 +22.9% Ryzen 5 5625U1447 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core. Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use moremodern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes calledSingle-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 15% Ryzen 7 5825U232 +3.8% Ryzen 5 5625U223 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core. Cinebench R11.5is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use moremodern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core versionloadsa singlethread with ray tracing torender a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 14% Ryzen 7 5825U2.75 +4.2% Ryzen 5 5625U2.64 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core. TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that waswidely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It containsseveral embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measuresdata encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 7 5825U8.7 +41.5% Ryzen 5 5625U6.2 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 41% in TrueCrypt AES. WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results aremeasured in kilobytesper second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 7 5825U5835 Ryzen 5 5625U6341 +8.7% Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 5825U by 9% in WinRAR 4.0. x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark usesMPEG 4 x264 compression methodto compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant thatproduces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file wereencoded per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 7 5825U250 +8.9% Ryzen 5 5625U229 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 9% in x264 encoding pass 1. x264 Pass 2is a slowervariant of x264 video compression thatproduces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used whenit is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 7 5825U100 +22.2% Ryzen 5 5625U82 Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 22% in x264 encoding pass 2. The Ryzen 7 5825U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5625U in performance tests. Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU. Ryzen 7 5825U Ryzen 5 5625U Like Like We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. 4.2594 votes Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5: 4.2972 votes Rate Ryzen 5 5625U on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5825U or Ryzen 5 5625U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregated performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 591 723 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Market segment Laptop Laptop Series AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Architecture codename Barcelo-U (Zen 3) Barcelo-U (Zen 3) Release date 6 January 2022 (2 years ago) 6 January 2022 (2 years ago) Detailed specifications
Physical cores 8 (Octa-Core) 6 (Hexa-Core) Threads 16 12 Base clock speed 2 GHz 2.3 GHz Boost clock speed 4.5 GHz 4.3 GHz L1 cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core) L2 cache 512K (per core) 512K (per core) L3 cache 16 MB (shared) 16 MB (shared) Chip lithography 7 nm 7 nm Die size 180 mm2 180 mm2 Maximum core temperature 95 °C 95 °C Number of transistors 10,700 million 10,700 million 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility + + Unlocked multiplier No No Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1 Socket FP6 FP6 Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction set extensions DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME AES-NI + + FMA + + AVX + + Virtualization technologies
AMD-V + + Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR4 Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics card
CompareAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 3.0 PCI Express lanes 16 16 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
3DMark06 CPU
wPrime 32
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
TrueCrypt AES
WinRAR 4.0
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 encoding pass 2
Gaming performance
Pros & cons summary
Performance score 11.89 9.68 Integrated graphics card 9.07 7.42 Physical cores 8 6 Threads 16 12 Vote for your favorite
Similar processor comparisons
Community ratings
Questions & comments
Ryzen 75825U vsRyzen 57535HS
Ryzen 55625U vsRyzen 5PRO 5650U
Ryzen 75825U vsRyzen 74800HS
Ryzen 75825U vsRyzen 35425U